A blog set up to provide reading, video and audio material for students studying AS and A-Level Politics at Alleyn's School.
Showing posts with label The US Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The US Constitution. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

The Constitutional Basis of Federalism

The U.S. Constitution does not use the term federalism, nor does it provide extensive details about the federal system. Nevertheless, the framers helped created a federalist system in the United States, particularly in the ways the Constitution allocates power.

The National Government
Article VI of the Constitution declares that the Constitution and any laws passed under it form the “supreme Law of the Land” in a passage called the supremacy clause. This clause implies that the national government has authority over the state governments.

The Constitution grants the national government several different kinds of powers and prohibits it from taking certain actions. The Constitution outlines four major types of power: enumerated, implied, inherent, and prohibited.
THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT’S POWERS
Type
Key Clause
Explanation
Examples
Enumerated (expressed)Article I, Section 8Powers explicitly granted to CongressDeclare war, coin money, levy taxes, regulate interstate commerce
ImpliedNecessary and proper (Article I, Section 8)Powers that Congress has assumed in order to better do its jobRegulate telecommunications, build interstate highways
InherentPreamblePowers inherent to a sovereign nationDefend itself from foreign and domestic enemies
ProhibitedArticle I, Section 9Powers prohibited to the national governmentSuspend the writ of habeas corpus, tax exports

Enumerated Powers
In Article I, Section 8, the Constitution specifically grants Congress a number of different powers, now known as the enumerated powers. The enumerated powers include the power to declare war, coin money, and regulate interstate commerce. Because these powers are expressly stated in the Constitution, political scientists sometimes also refer to them as expressed powers.
Implied Powers

The national government is not limited to the enumerated powers. At the end of Article I, Section 8, the Constitution also grants Congress the power to do anything “necessary and proper” to carry out its duties. This clause is known as the necessary and proper clause or the elastic clause because of its mutability. Because the powers bestowed by this clause are implied rather than stated, they also are known as implied powers.

Example: The Constitution does not specifically grant Congress the power to regulate telecommunications because such technology did not exist at the time of the founding. But according to the Constitution, Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. Regulating telecommunications is considered necessary for Congress to properly regulate interstate commerce, and so Congress has since assumed this power.

McCulloch v. Maryland

This landmark Supreme Court case from 1819 concerned a state government’s ability to tax a national bank. The Court, relying on the necessary and proper clause, ruled that the national government has far more powers than the Constitution enumerates in Article I, Section 8. The necessary and proper clause has allowed the national government to regulate air travel, combat industrial pollution, and foster the creation and growth of the Internet.
Inherent Powers
The preamble to the Constitution lays out the basic purposes of the United States government: to provide for the welfare of its citizens and to defend against external enemies. Because the federal government is sovereign, it also has certain powers called inherent powers, which are necessary to protect its citizens and defend its right to exist. The primary inherent power is self-preservation: A state has the right to defend itself from foreign and domestic enemies.
Prohibited Powers
The Constitution also explicitly denies the national government certain powers. For example, Congress cannot tax exports or tell states how to choose electors for the Electoral College. The powers denied to the national government are called the prohibited powers.

The Commerce Clause
The Supreme Court’s decision in the 1824 case Gibbons v. Ogden reasserted the federal government’s authority over the states. Aaron Ogden had a monopoly on steamship navigation from the state of New York. When Thomas Gibbons began operating his steamship in New York waterways, Ogden sued. The Court found that New York State did not have the right to issue a monopoly to Ogden because only the national government has the power to regulate interstate commerce. Chief Justice John Marshall referred to the commerce clause (which gives Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce) of the Constitution as justification for his decision.
The State Governments
The Constitution also grants state governments some key powers, including the right to determine how to choose delegates to the Electoral College. States also have a great deal of latitude to write their own constitutions and pass their own laws. All state governments have three branches (paralleling the national government), although the powers granted to the branches differ in each state. In some states, for example, the governor has a great deal of power, whereas in others, his or her power is severely limited. States also use a variety of methods to choose judges.

The vast expanse of the national government has led some to conclude that state governments are of secondary importance. In 1941, for example, Supreme Court justice Harlan Stone remarked that the Tenth Amendment (which reserves powers to the states) had no real meaning. State governments, however, are still vital political actors, and they have adapted to new roles and new circumstances. At the start of the twenty-first century, many states have reasserted their strength and taken a larger role in homeland security, economics, and environmental policy.

Professional and Nonprofessional LegislaturesAll states have a legislative body that makes laws, and all but one of the legislatures are bicameral. (Nebraska is the lone state with a unicameral legislature.) In some states, being a legislator is a full-time job. These legislators are paid well, have large staffs, and meet in session for much of the year. Political scientists call this type of legislature a professional legislature. In other states, the legislators are in session for short periods, receive very little pay, and have almost no staff. These states pride themselves on having nonprofessional citizen legislators rather than professional politicians.
Reserved Powers
The Tenth Amendment states that the powers not granted to the national government, and not prohibited to state governments, are “reserved to the States.” Political scientists call this the reservation clause, and the powers that states derive from this clause are known as the reserved powers.

Concurrent Powers
Powers held by both states and the national government are known asconcurrent powers. The power to tax is an example of a concurrent power: People pay taxes at the local, state, and federal levels.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause
The full faith and credit clause (found in Article IV of the Constitution) both establishes and limits state powers. It declares that state governments must respect the laws and decisions of other state governments, such as driver licenses and marriage certificates issued by other states. To some extent, then, the clause expands state power: A state’s decision is binding on other states. At the same time, the clause limits state power by forcing the states to honor one another’s laws.
Local Governments
Although the Constitution mentions state governments and grants them some specific powers, it does not mention local governments at all. Courts have interpreted this omission to mean that local governments are entirely under the authority of state governments and that a state can create and abolish local governments as it sees fit.

State Power
The most obvious example of state supremacy over local government is that state governments take over local institutions somewhat regularly. State governments also have the power to redefine local governments, stripping their powers and changing the laws. In 1995, for example, the state of Illinois gave the mayor of Chicago almost complete control of the Chicago school system because the previous board of education had failed to improve schools.
Types of Local Government
States have created a multitude of types of local government. In fact, there are approximately 84,000 local governments in the United States. Each state has the power to define local government in any way it wants, allocating different types and degrees of power and responsibility. For a local government to have power, it must be granted a charter by the state, specifying its powers and responsibilities.

Most states grant some degree of autonomy to local governments. This autonomy is known as home rule: a promise by the state government to refrain from interfering in local issues. State governments give up this power because local governments with substantial autonomy can often manage local affairs better than the state government could. Ultimately, however, the state can still take power away from local governments, even those with home rule.

Some states have a complicated patchwork of town governments, with villages, townships, counties, and cities all having different powers. The most common—and probably the least known—type of local government is called a special district, a local government created to deal with a single issue or problem. Special districts frequently overlap with other types of local government, and the range of powers they possess varies greatly. Control of special districts also varies greatly: Some have elected leadership, whereas others have leaders appointed by the governor or legislature.

Example: Special districts are the most numerous type of government in the United States—totaling more than 39,000 across the country. They are also the most diverse. In some states, boards of education are special districts. Most states also have very specialized districts, such as water reclamation districts, boards to oversee public universities, and economic development districts. In some states, many of these districts have elected leaders. In Illinois, for example, citizens vote for dozens of local governments. Some special districts have the power to borrow money and oversee major construction projects (such as bridges, landfills, and treatment plants).

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Janet Yellen to be nominated as next head of the US Federal Reserve

US President Barack Obama will nominate Federal Reserve Vice-Chair Janet Yellen to be the next head of the US central bank on Wednesday, according to a White House official.

If confirmed by the US Senate, Ms Yellen, 67, would replace Ben Bernanke, who has held the post for eight years.

She has been his deputy for the last two years, and would become the first woman to head the Federal Reserve.

Ms Yellen and Mr Bernanke are due to appear with the president on Wednesday.

She has taught at Harvard University and the London School of Economics, as well as holding a series of senior administrative positions in the US.



See Mark Mardell, BBC North America Editor's opinion on Yellen's nomination here

Monday, 30 September 2013

Seven hours to go until US Government Shutdown ... and that isn't even the worst of it...

The US Senate has rejected a budget bill passed (see BBC article for some decent analysis) by the Republican-led House of Representatives, with just hours left to avert a government shutdown.

The Democratic-led Senate voted 54-46 against the bill, which would fund the government only if President Obama's healthcare law were delayed a year.

If no agreement is reached by midnight (04:00 GMT), the government will close all non-essential federal services.
Capitol Hill


See this interesting BBC article on the US government shutdown, and how this isn't even the worst of it. The bigger problem is, if the Democrats and Republicans continue to disagree, then the US would breach its "debt ceiling" - that means there's a chance that the world's biggest economy could default on its debt.

Monday, 23 September 2013

WND Superstore - Independent US News Website Shop launches Politically Orientated Bumper Stickers...



WND Superstore claims to be an extension of its news and information service, providing products that enlighten and empower you in your personal quest to protect your family, engage the culture, speak out against injustice, and fight for what is right.

Here are some items that seek to protect you and your family including; 
I Want You to Speak English Bumper Sticker
I'm Pro Choice on Guns Magnetic/Easy-Off Adhesive Bumper Sticker
Dead Men Vote Democrat Magnetic/Easy-Off Adhesive Bumper Sticker
GIVE ME 4 MORE YEARS … TO FIND MY BIRTH CERTIFICATE! Magnetic/Easy-Off Adhesive Bumper Sticker
HONK FOR IMPEACHMENT Magnetic/Easy-Off Adhesive Bumper Sticker
Bumper stickers

The Ten Commandments (Yard/Rally Sign) (18
Yard signs

RADSticker: Miniature Radiation Detector
And my favourite ... a radiation detector ... in case you need one. 
According to the WND Superstore website, "the mission of the WND Superstore is to help equip you to analyze, understand, and act on the challenges we face in the world around us. We seek to be a reliable provider of information products that have practical and transcendent value to you."

Practical and transcendent eh? I'm not sure. What do you think?

Saturday, 21 September 2013

Recent John Boehner Plan Highlights Importance of Checks and Balances

John Boehner, current Speaker of the US House of Representatives (Ohio), has recently suggested a Republican plan to avert the immanent 'fiscal cliff' or austerity crisis, by using Congress' powers to raise the debt ceiling (the amount that the government can borrow for public spending). To not raise the ceiling would lead to severe austerity and possible recession.

This'll go well. (J. Scott Applewhite, File/Associated Press)

Boehner has suggested that he would only agree for Congress to raise the debt ceiling if  President Obama agreed to make changes to Obamacare. He has accused the President of partisanship (working in the interests of his party - in contrast to bipartisanship [working with other parties to achieve a goal]):
“Given the long history of using debt limit increases to achieve bipartisan deficit reduction and economic reforms, the speaker was disappointed but told the president that the two chambers of Congress will chart the path ahead,” a Boehner aide said in an email.
President Obama warned Boehner against playing politics with the nation's finances:
“The President telephoned Speaker Boehner and told him again that the full faith and credit of the United States should not and will not be subject to negotiation,” the official said in a statement provided to POLITICO. “The President reiterated that it is the constitutional responsibility of the US Congress to pass the nation’s budget and pay the nation’s bills.”
He has now suggested granting autonomous power to the president to willfully raise the debt ceiling without Congress.

Opinions vary on whether this is good or bad thing for checks and balances. On the one hand,  handing over additional powers to the president could be seen as undesirable as signals an expansion of the executive. The bipartisan compromises that come out of incidences between Congress and the President lead to effective checks and balances on abuses of power.

The argument can also be made that accomplishing things would come at a greater ease and benefit to the people if only one man had the power to enact changes. This is something that the Founding Fathers were guarding against, because they understood that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

However, William Galston, writing in the Wall Street Journal, said President Obama is probably permitted - and even required - to borrow money himself in order to pay off debts coming due and to avoid defaulting, whether Congress approves or not.

Writes Galston:

The precise constitutional issue is the relation between the two terse sentences that define and delimit authority over government borrowing. Article I, section 8, provides (in part) that “The Congress shall have Power . . . To borrow money on the credit of the United States.”
The other key constitutional provision is section 4 of the 14th Amendment, which provides (in part) that “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions . . . shall not be questioned . . . ”
The most plausible reading of the Constitution allows him—in fact requires him—to do what is necessary to avoid defaulting on the public debt, whatever Congress may do or fail to do. But the Constitution does not allow him to treat all existing statutory programs on a par with the public debt—if doing so would require him to issue new debt above and beyond what is needed to pay the principal and interest on existing debt.

Obama appears to agree. What you think Mill Hill Politics students? 

An article agreeing that powers should be given to the President to raise debt ceiling:

Thursday, 19 September 2013

Gridlock and divided government

A collection of recent news articles on gridlock and the political impact of divided government in the US.

Checks and balances in the US Constitution: Presidential vetoes

Article I of the US Constitution requires every bill, order, resolution or other act of legislation by the Congress of the United States to be presented to the President of the United States for his approval.

When the President is presented the bill, he can either sign it into law, return the bill to the originating house of Congress with his objections to the bill (a veto), or neither sign nor return it to Congress after having been presented the bill for ten days exempting Sundays (if Congress is still in session, the bill becomes a law; otherwise, the bill does not become a law and is considered a pocket veto).

Occasionally, a President either publicly or privately threatens Congress with a veto to influence the content or passage of legislation. There is no record of what officially constitutes a "veto threat," or how many have been made over the years, but it has become a staple of Presidential politics and a sometimes effective way of shaping policy.

Here is a list of recent presidential vetoes. 

PresidentRegular
vetoes
Pocket
vetoes
Total
vetoes
Vetoes
overridden
Percentage vetoes
overridden[2]
Percentage regular
vetoes overridden
Total1497106725641104%7%






Richard Nixon261743716%27%
Gerald Ford4818661218%25%
Jimmy Carter13183126%15%
Ronald Reagan393978912%23%
George H. W. Bush[3][4]29154412%2%
Bill Clinton3613725%6%
George W. Bush11112433%36%
Barack Obama20200%0%
Barack Obama 

December 30, 2009: Vetoed H.J.Res. 64, Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2010, and for other purposes. Override attempt failed in House.

October 7, 2010: Vetoed H.R. 3808, the Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010. Override attempt failed in House.


Tuesday, 17 September 2013

Divided government in the US - the last 45 years

The checks and balances between the three branches of the federal government have important consequences for US politics. Gridlock can result when the Senate disagrees with the President. For most recent presidents have accused the Senate of either rejecting or blocking their judicial nominations for partisan reasons.

This raises the issue of 'divided government', a term used to refer to the situation in which one party controls the presidency and the other party controls Congress. Of late, this has become the norm. 

The 40 years between 1969 and 2009 have seen 22 years of divided government when both houses of Congress were controlled by the party which did not control the White House.

YearPresidentSenateHouse



1969-1971
R
D
D
1971-1973
R
D
D
1973-1975
R
D
D
1975-1977
R
D
D
1977–1979
D
D
D
1979–1981
D
D
D
1981-1983
R
R
D
1983-1985
R
R
D
1985-1987
R
R
D
1987-1989
R
D
D
1989-1991
R
D
D
1991-1993
R
D
D
1993–1995
D
D
D
1995-1997
D
R
R
1997-1999
D
R
R
1999-2001
D
R
R
2001-2003
R
D*
R
2003–2005
R
R
R
2005–2007
R
R
R
2007-2009
R
D
D
2009–2011
D
D
D
2011-2013
D
D
R
2013-2015
D
D
R
*The 2000 election resulted in a 50-50 tie in the Senate, and the Constitution gives tie-breaking power to the Vice President. The Vice President was Democrat Al Gore from January 3, 2001 until the inauguration of Republican Richard Cheney on January 20. Then on May 24, Republican Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont left the Republican Party to caucus with the Democrats as an independent, resulting in another shift of control.

A good website on the US Constitution

This site is designed to help the user understand the United States Constitution. It contains vocabulary, information, graphics, resource links, activities and quizzes to help the user learn the tenets of the United States Constitution. The site is accessible for use by persons with and without disabilities.

Sunday, 15 September 2013

Handy Youtube playlist on The US Constitution

A handy youtube playlist on the The US Constitution can be found here. Some deleted videos. There's some great stuff here, including the late night hosts focus on Speaker John Boehner's 'over-sized gavel'.

Another Video from Educator, Vlogger and Author John Green on The Constitution and Federalism


Congress and the Commander in Chief

Informative radio programme. As the US Congress prepares to vote on whether to take military action against Syria, the BBC World Service explores how the US has taken similar decisions in the past – and how that might shape the decisions of the present. Claire Bolderson delves into the history of tension over the issue between the White House and Capitol Hill.